From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linda Knippers Subject: Re: Double addition of rule yields two log messages Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:47:45 -0400 Message-ID: <446E12D1.2060709@hp.com> References: <446DE295.8040503@us.ibm.com> <446E0323.4030905@us.ibm.com> <446E0925.1000400@hp.com> <200605191429.18451.sgrubb@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200605191429.18451.sgrubb@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Steve Grubb Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com >>Speaking of ausearch, I just noticed that it emits this message: >>> >>> # /sbin/ausearch -m CONFIG_CHANGE -i >>> Warning - freq is non-zero and incremental flushing not selected. > > That comes from the config file parser. You've got a problem > in /etc/audit/auditd.conf that should be fixed. Its true that my auditd.conf (which I don't think I've ever modified) has freq = 20 and flush = SYNC. I assume that SYNC means that freq is ignored. The manpage says freq is only valid if flush=incremental so it seems like an unnecessary warning. But why does ausearch care? Seems like if anything cared it would be the auditd but I can't find an error or warning from it anywhere. Seems really odd that this message comes from ausearch. -- ljk