From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael C Thompson Subject: Re: file watch and stat Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:22:17 -0500 Message-ID: <45218309.7050900@us.ibm.com> References: <45216583.6060405@us.ibm.com> <20061002201116.GA17635@fc.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k92LMSaW002261 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 17:22:28 -0400 Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com (e5.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.145]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k92LMR9L026168 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 17:22:27 -0400 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k92LML5q027039 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 17:22:21 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/NCO v8.1.1) with ESMTP id k92LMJjV270306 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 17:22:21 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k92LMJmh029156 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 17:22:19 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (pendarric.austin.ibm.com [9.41.46.108]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k92LMIrE029120 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 17:22:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20061002201116.GA17635@fc.hp.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com Amy Griffis wrote: > Michael C Thompson wrote: [Mon Oct 02 2006, 03:16:19PM EDT] >> Hey all, >> >> I'm trying to figure out why having a watch a on file is not generating >> a record when I stat said file. >> >> Put a watch on a file, and do stat file. >> >> No record... I'm not sure why this is happening, isn't getting such >> information considered security relevant? > > What is your audit rule? auditctl -w /path/to/file Mike