From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael C Thompson <thompsmc@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: syscall record for mq_unlink
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:17:53 -0600
Message-ID: <4563DD81.5090101@us.ibm.com>
References: <45637801.7060004@us.ibm.com>
	<200611211720.35021.sgrubb@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <200611211720.35021.sgrubb@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 November 2006 17:04, Michael C Thompson wrote:
>> Any ideas? This is on the lspp.55 kernel.
> 
> Sounds like it might be a bug. Maybe one of the kernel people could look into
> it? If not, file a bug and we'll handle it that way.

I am seeing the same behaviour with mq_open... I'll file a bug so it 
doesn't get lost over the holidays, and I'll see if I can get some 
kernel people on my end to take a peek at it.

Thanks,
Mike