From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: check the length of userspace generated audit records
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 08:48:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4619720.NsCMrGOoMo@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200421001805.imgllrwuir7i4ry7@madcap2.tricolour.ca>
On Monday, April 20, 2020 8:18:06 PM EDT Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 2020-04-20 17:56, Lenny Bruzenak wrote:
> > On 4/20/20 5:29 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 5:56 PM Richard Guy Briggs<rgb@redhat.com>
wrote:
> > > > On 2020-04-20 17:36, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > > > Commit 756125289285 ("audit: always check the netlink payload
> > > > > length
> > > > > in audit_receive_msg()") fixed a number of missing message length
> > > > > checks, but forgot to check the length of userspace generated audit
> > > > > records. The good news is that you need CAP_AUDIT_WRITE to submit
> > > > > userspace audit records, which is generally only given to trusted
> > > > > processes, so the impact should be limited.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cc:stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > Fixes: 756125289285 ("audit: always check the netlink payload
> > > > > length in audit_receive_msg()")
> > > > > Reported-by:syzbot+49e69b4d71a420ceda3e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Moore<paul@paul-moore.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >
> > > > > kernel/audit.c | 3 +++
> > > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> > > > > index b69c8b460341..87f31bf1f0a0 100644
> > > > > --- a/kernel/audit.c
> > > > > +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> > > > > @@ -1326,6 +1326,9 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff
> > > > > *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)> > > >
> > > > > case AUDIT_FIRST_USER_MSG2 ... AUDIT_LAST_USER_MSG2:
> > > > > if (!audit_enabled && msg_type != AUDIT_USER_AVC)
> > > > >
> > > > > return 0;
> > > > >
> > > > > + /* exit early if there isn't at least one character
> > > > > to print */ + if (data_len < 2)
> > > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > >
> > > > Don't we want to issue the record even if the message is empty? If a
> > > > len of 1 is passed in, it will properly set str[0] = '\0' and str
> > > > points
> > > > to a location with a null that prints nothing between the single
> > > > quotes
> > > > of "msg=''". So, I think that should be "if (data_len < 1)".
> > > >
> > > > Am I missing something?
> > >
> > > I've got no problem with allowing an empty message so long as there is
> > > a valid use for such a message. Can anyone think of a valid reason
> > > for having an empty userspace generated record?
> >
> > Not really. Using the libaudit interface(s), even if an empty message
> > string is sent, and handled in the lib call(s), I believe it will have
> > minimum contextual info, e.g. "exe=... hostname=... ", etc.
> >
> > I can't think of a valid reason myself, assuming IIUC.
>
> But even with an empty message, there is still pid, uid, auid, ses, subj
> added by the kernel with its own message type. I could see a valid type
> of user message created that has no need for any of those fields added
> by audit_log_user_message(), calling audit_send_user_message() directly
> (but mind you, it appears to be deprecated to call it directly).
There is no valid reason. Even allowing just 1 character is also invalid and
a waste of disk space. But I guess you need to draw the line somewhere.
-Steve
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-21 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-20 21:36 [PATCH] audit: check the length of userspace generated audit records Paul Moore
2020-04-20 21:56 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2020-04-20 23:29 ` Paul Moore
2020-04-20 23:56 ` Lenny Bruzenak
2020-04-21 0:18 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2020-04-21 12:48 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2020-04-21 21:24 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4619720.NsCMrGOoMo@x2 \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox