From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Yu Zhiguo <yuzg@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix a bug that option '-i' cannot be used
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:48:32 +0800
Message-ID: <488A9080.3080101@cn.fujitsu.com>
References: <48816289.4060500@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<200807251422.49483.sgrubb@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <200807251422.49483.sgrubb@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Cc: audit-list <linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

Hello Steve,

Steve Grubb worte:

> I was just looking at this patch. The intention with the -R option is for it 
> to be given saying that all options will be read from the file. You should be 
> able to place "-i" on a line by itself within the file and it should ignore 
> errors. This would be similar to the way the -D option is given by itself 
> near the top of a typical rule file.
> 
Thanks for your detailed explanation. I think I understand the usage about
option '-i' now.

> I agree with some of the cleanup that this patch suggests and will apply that 
> part. But I think the intent was for "-i" to be in the file and not the 
> command line.
ok, thanks..

-- 
Regards
Yu Zhiguo