From: zhangxiliang <zhangxiliang@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>, Linux Audit <linux-audit@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Fix the bug of the error message for -7 when checking field
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 18:03:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <489430FF.40908@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
Hello Steve,
When field is AUDIT_EXIT, AUDIT_SUCCESS and so on, the entry,user,task,exclude filter list should be invalid on anything.
So I think using "flags != AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT" is better than "flags == AUDIT_FILTER_ENTRY".
The error message for "-7" is not suit in some conditions.
For example,
1, auditctl -a task,always -F perm=r
Error message is "Field perm cannot be checked at syscall entry".
It should be task filter list.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiliang <zhangxiliang@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
lib/deprecated.c | 5 ++---
lib/libaudit.c | 4 ++--
src/auditctl.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/deprecated.c b/lib/deprecated.c
index 4f0c14e..4ad8253 100644
--- a/lib/deprecated.c
+++ b/lib/deprecated.c
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ int audit_rule_fieldpair(struct audit_rule *rule, const char *pair, int flags)
}
break;
case AUDIT_EXIT:
- if (flags == AUDIT_FILTER_ENTRY)
+ if (flags != AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT)
return -7;
vlen = strlen(v);
if (isdigit((char)*(v)))
@@ -427,8 +427,7 @@ int audit_rule_fieldpair(struct audit_rule *rule, const char *pair, int flags)
return -10;
case AUDIT_DEVMAJOR...AUDIT_INODE:
case AUDIT_SUCCESS...AUDIT_SUCCESS:
-
- if (flags == AUDIT_FILTER_ENTRY)
+ if (flags != AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT)
return -7;
/* fallthrough */
default:
diff --git a/lib/libaudit.c b/lib/libaudit.c
index 563b8ad..d439c2f 100644
--- a/lib/libaudit.c
+++ b/lib/libaudit.c
@@ -870,7 +870,7 @@ int audit_rule_fieldpair_data(struct audit_rule_data **rulep, const char *pair,
}
break;
case AUDIT_EXIT:
- if (flags == AUDIT_FILTER_ENTRY)
+ if (flags != AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT)
return -7;
vlen = strlen(v);
if (isdigit((char)*(v)))
@@ -1071,7 +1071,7 @@ int audit_rule_fieldpair_data(struct audit_rule_data **rulep, const char *pair,
break;
case AUDIT_DEVMAJOR...AUDIT_INODE:
case AUDIT_SUCCESS...AUDIT_SUCCESS:
- if (flags == AUDIT_FILTER_ENTRY)
+ if (flags != AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT)
return -7;
/* fallthrough */
default:
diff --git a/src/auditctl.c b/src/auditctl.c
index d740509..5b6de26 100644
--- a/src/auditctl.c
+++ b/src/auditctl.c
@@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ static int setopt(int count, char *vars[])
break;
case -7:
fprintf(stderr,
- "Field %s cannot be checked at syscall entry\n",
+ "Field %s can only be used with exit filter list\n",
optarg);
retval = -1;
break;
--
Regards
Zhang Xiliang
next reply other threads:[~2008-08-02 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-02 10:03 zhangxiliang [this message]
2008-08-04 23:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] Fix the bug of the error message for -7 when checking field Steve Grubb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=489430FF.40908@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=zhangxiliang@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox