From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Zhang Xiliang <zhangxiliang@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] The error message of "-1" in field checking isnot suit
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:13:01 +0800
Message-ID: <48995D0D.8090208@cn.fujitsu.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>, Linux Audit <linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

Hello Steve, 

The error message of "-1" is "-F missing = for ...".
The opration isnot only "=". 
So I think "F missing opration for" is better.


Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiliang <zhangxiliang@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 src/auditctl.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/auditctl.c b/src/auditctl.c
index 3958afb..a19bd14 100644
--- a/src/auditctl.c
+++ b/src/auditctl.c
@@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ static int setopt(int count, char *vars[])
 					audit_permadded = 1;
 				break;
 			case -1:
-				fprintf(stderr, "-F missing = for %s\n", 
+				fprintf(stderr, "-F missing opration for %s\n", 
 					optarg);
 				retval = -1;
 				break;