From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Dennis <jdennis@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: get_field_str() and interpret_field() bug with multi-word fields
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:11:48 -0400
Message-ID: <48A20AA4.1020409@redhat.com>
References: <0E43BF2D7491F0468B56B1A5C493866B020DD0F1@SAT4MX07.RACKSPACE.CORP>
	<200808121718.36331.sgrubb@redhat.com>
	<48A20330.7090206@redhat.com>
	<200808121753.10501.sgrubb@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <200808121753.10501.sgrubb@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Cc: William Kelly <wkelly@rackspace.com>, linux-audit@redhat.com, Bret Piatt <bret.piatt@rackspace.com>
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

Steve Grubb wrote:
> With backwards compatibility you don't have to worry about having tools of 
> that era.
>   

This does not address the problem of matching a log file to a kernel 
version nor unanticipated user space provided audit records.

-- 
John Dennis <jdennis@redhat.com>