From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Casey Schaufler Subject: Re: user message limits Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:49:54 -0800 Message-ID: <498286F2.9060200@schaufler-ca.com> References: <1233100868.30154.103.camel@homeserver> <200901281215.16996.sgrubb@redhat.com> <1233164667.30154.142.camel@homeserver> <200901281514.05301.sgrubb@redhat.com> <1233174645.30154.164.camel@homeserver> <4980EC33.3070306@schaufler-ca.com> <1233186745.30154.215.camel@homeserver> <4980FA1F.6090600@schaufler-ca.com> <49815353.7080105@MagitekLtd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n0U4rG8v022557 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:53:16 -0500 Received: from smtp110.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp110.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [98.136.44.55]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id n0U4o2Lg016395 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:50:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <49815353.7080105@MagitekLtd.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: "James W. Hoeft" Cc: LC Bruzenak , Linux Audit List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com James W. Hoeft wrote: > The requirement to include the entire cut buffer was only for high to > low (downgrade) transfers (which are only allowed for text), and was a > "derived" requirement, in that we had to include the text in the audit > logs in order to get approval to provide that capability. ... if she floats, she weighs less than a duck, and that makes her a witch! Burn her! How did you become so wise in the ways of science? Ah yes, evaluators. There were several places in the CMW spec that pretty well required things that it also forbade you from doing. It explains much.