From: LC Bruzenak <lenny@magitekltd.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: file watch question
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:32:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <520E9A69.9030208@magitekltd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <520E894A.6010403@magitekltd.com>
On 08/16/2013 03:19 PM, LC Bruzenak wrote:
> The line saying, "Unlike most syscall auditing rules, watches do not
> impact performance based on the number of rules sent to the kernel" -
> does this mean that BOTH the "-w" and "syscall" rules have no
> performance impact?
>
> Thx,
> LCB
>
Nevermind; I see that the rule in force (with auditctl -l) is the same
regardless of the way it is specified in the auditctl line.
Thx,
LCB
--
LC (Lenny) Bruzenak
lenny@magitekltd.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-16 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-16 20:19 file watch question LC Bruzenak
2013-08-16 21:32 ` LC Bruzenak [this message]
2013-08-16 22:08 ` Steve Grubb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=520E9A69.9030208@magitekltd.com \
--to=lenny@magitekltd.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox