From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Jones Subject: Re: Rational behind RefuseManualStop=yes in auditd.service Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 12:16:15 -0800 Message-ID: <529E3C0F.8040607@suse.de> References: <20130730220446.0dced4f5@fornost.bigon.be> <3276481.Os0RojCrYf@x2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3276481.Os0RojCrYf@x2> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On 07/30/2013 01:25 PM, Steve Grubb wrote: > On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 10:04:46 PM Laurent Bigonville wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to know the rational behind RefuseManualStop=yes in >> auditd.service file. > > The short term "fix" is to force admins to use the service command which loads > legacy helper scripts which are pulled from the old SysV init script. It sends > signals in the user's context so that the auid is correct. You mean this? https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-June/169411.html The problem is that (I believe) this feature isn't in upstream systemd, rather it's Fedora specific. > If you don't need to meet common criteria requirements, then patch it out so its the way you like it. If I'm correct and the above is Fedora specific, I would have thought the better option was to not use such extensions in the audit svn codebase; rather patch them *in* via the Fedora rpms. Or make it configure tuneable. Tony