Re: [RFC][PATCH] audit: log join and part events to the read-only multicast log socket

LC Bruzenak
2014-10-22T15:51:53Z

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1051 bytes --]

On 10/22/2014 10:12 AM, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 10:25 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
>
>> 1) For the *at syscalls, can we get the path from the FD being passed to be
>> able to reconstruct what is being accessed?
> You might sometimes be able to get A path. But every time anyone ever
> says THE path they've already lost. There is no THE path. There might
> be NO path. Every single request with THE path is always doomed to
> fail.
IIUC we've got to have some assurance that the path is legit for forensics.
Technically I believe I understand and concur with what you are saying
Eric, but as a guy on the far end of the process I know I need to be
able to reference a complete path to a FD.
One which we believe did exist at the time the mod occurred. To me,
sometimes isn't really good enough. But A path probably is.
...
>> 9) Can we get events for a watched file even when a user's permissions do not
>> allow full path resolution?
> No.
No?

Thx,
LCB

--
LC (Lenny) Bruzenak
lenny@magitekltd.com

[-- Attachment #1.2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 2193 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]