From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Grubb Subject: Re: Licensing of libaudit and libauparse Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 13:54:52 -0400 Message-ID: <5461078.5fIGDCxYjZ@x2> References: <20170319033214.GA23622@clifford> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170319033214.GA23622@clifford> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Saturday, March 18, 2017 11:32:14 PM EDT Richard Fontana wrote: > Hi, > > The README file in the audit userspace package says: > > LICENSE > ======= > The audit daemon is released as GPL'd code. The > audit daemon's libraries libaudit.* and libauparse.* are released > under LGPL so that it may be linked with 3rd party software. > > However don't these libraries contain code from this file > https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-userspace/blob/master/lib/strsplit.c > which states its license is GPLv2+? Yes, that looks like a copy and paste mistake. Thanks for pointing that out. Anything in: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-userspace/blob/master/lib/ https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-userspace/blob/master/auparse/ https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-userspace/blob/master/bindings/ is intended to LGPL. Would replacing the comment at the beginning of the file be sufficient to fix this issue? Thanks, -Steve