From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Jones Subject: seccomp and audit_enabled Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 20:50:01 -0700 Message-ID: <56188AE9.4030306@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t9A3uxpF010574 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 23:56:59 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C378F2F02B1 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 03:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE87AAC8 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 03:56:55 +0000 (UTC) List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com Hi. What is the expected handling of AUDIT_SECCOMP if audit_enabled == 0? Opera browser makes use of a sandbox and if audit_enabled == 0 (and no auditd is running) there is a lot of messages dumped to the klog. The fix to __audit_seccomp() is trivial, similar to c2412d91c and I can send a patch, I'm just not sure if seccomp is somehow special? Thanks Tony