Linux-audit Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: LC Bruzenak <lenny@magitekltd.com>
To: "linux-audit@redhat.com" <linux-audit@redhat.com>
Subject: ausearch checkpoint question
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 12:30:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57ED6BBC.7030503@magitekltd.com> (raw)

I'm using the 2.4.5-3 audit rpm set and I tried using the ausearch 
"checkpoint" option a couple weeks ago.
This was on a moderately busy system (judging by my own 
systems/experience) generating say 300-400MB of data/day.

I tried the checkpoint option in a 5-minute cron job, and I noticed that 
in comparison to the "-ts recent" option, it took far longer to complete.
The "recent" option result was less than a second, whereas the 
checkpoint version took ~20 seconds every 5 minutes.

It's possible there were other factors at play; e.g. it was used on a 
mls-policy machine, and although I saw no AVCs, it's possible there were 
some access issues I didn't have time to investigate.
On my intended application, I'll be on a standard targeted-policy 
machine so this won't be a potential factor.

I need to test this again, as I'm considering using the ausearch 
checkpoint capability for some new requirements, I was wondering if 
perhaps there were any timing results done or if there are any tips and 
tricks to getting the most out of it. Also - the man page section 
describing this is a little confusing to me so if anyone has a script 
segment that would be very helpful.

Thanks in advance,
LCB

-- 
LC Bruzenak
magitekltd.com

             reply	other threads:[~2016-09-29 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-29 19:30 LC Bruzenak [this message]
2016-09-29 22:34 ` ausearch checkpoint question Burn Alting
2016-10-03 19:14   ` LC Bruzenak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57ED6BBC.7030503@magitekltd.com \
    --to=lenny@magitekltd.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox