From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: audit.rules file [Was: audit 2.3 released]
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 09:17:18 -0400
Message-ID: <6136940.FpU5ZKyNch@x2>
References: <3021693.HLtnhthvcE@x2> <20130505114357.7790a544@fornost.bigon.be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130505114357.7790a544@fornost.bigon.be>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/options/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

Hello,

On Sunday, May 05, 2013 11:43:57 AM Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > Several people have asked for a way to deposit rules into a directory
> > so that based on what is installed, rules can also be added. This
> > makes it easier to have a core system that gets packages, config, and
> > files added to make it a different kind of server or desktop. My
> > guess is that it will be mostly used to add watches on setuid apps
> > which can differ from machine type to machine type.
> > 
> > The place where these rules are stored is /etc/audit/rules.d.
> > Compiling rules from that directory will result in a new file being
> > written to /etc/audit/audit.rules. That means it can overwrite
> > existing rules. Since we don't want that to happen by accident,
> > augenrules is disabled by default.
> 
> [...]
> 
> The make install rule is now installing audit.rules in
> the /etc/audit/rules.d directory.
> 
> What would happen on fresh installation if augenrules call is disabled
> and that /etc/audit/audit.rules is not existing?
> 
> Will /etc/audit/rules.d/audit.rules be called as a fallback? Or should
> distributions take care of shipping both /etc/audit/audit.rules
> and /etc/audit/rules.d/audit.rules?
> 
> What do you think?

What I did in Fedora is to add a post install action like this:

%post
# Copy default rules into place on new installation
if [ ! -e /etc/audit/audit.rules ] ; then
        cp /etc/audit/rules.d/audit.rules /etc/audit/audit.rules
fi

This way if its a new install, you get a copy of the rules and if there are 
any previously existing rules, they are not overwritten.

-Steve