From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Moore Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 3/3] audit: add audit by children of executable path Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 10:30:02 -0400 Message-ID: <6430018.ENq3ajkyRS@sifl> References: <14f057b6cb8.2852.85c95baa4474aabc7814e68940a78392@paul-moore.com> <20150807063715.GB23800@madcap2.tricolour.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150807063715.GB23800@madcap2.tricolour.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Richard Guy Briggs Cc: Steve Grubb , linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Friday, August 07, 2015 02:37:15 AM Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On 15/08/06, Paul Moore wrote: > > > I guess what I'm saying is that I'm not currently convinced that > > there is enough value in this to offset the risk I feel the loop > > presents. I understand the use cases that you are mentioning, the > > are the same as the last time we discussed this, but I'm going to > > need something better than that. > > Can you better describe the loop that concerns you? I don't quite see > it. It would be the only loop in the patch, look at the for loop in audit_filter_rules() which iterates up the process' parent chain. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com