From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: Laurent Bigonville <bigon@debian.org>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: kauditd hold queue overflow in 4.11
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 20:13:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7894043.DVPTJZrtqs@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a809c621-36b8-d1ff-e3f7-5a749668681e@debian.org>
On Saturday, September 9, 2017 4:41:19 PM EDT Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Le 09/09/17 à 16:22, Steve Grubb a écrit :
> > On Saturday, September 9, 2017 6:02:02 AM EDT Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> >> Le 11/07/17 à 00:23, Paul Moore a écrit :
> >>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Laurent Bigonville <bigon@debian.org>
> > wrote:
> >>>> Le 10/07/17 à 18:00, Paul Moore a écrit :
> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Laurent Bigonville
> >>>>> <bigon@debian.org> wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> With 4.11.6 (that has been uploaded in debian unstable) I get a lot
> >>>>>> of messages in dmesg like
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [100052.120468] audit: audit_lost=66041 audit_rate_limit=0
> >>>>>> audit_backlog_limit=8192
> >>>>>> [100052.120470] audit: kauditd hold queue overflow
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And it also seems that the messages are not stored in auditd logs
> >>>>>> anymore.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/linus/264d509637d95f9404e52ced5003ad352e0f6a26
> >>>>>> seems to be included in this release
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Any idea?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm going to assume that your backlog limit is set to a sane value for
> >>>>> your system's configuration, so that leaves me with two commits that
> >>>>> may be of interest:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> * 1df30f8264b8 ("audit: fix the RCU locking for the auditd_connection
> >>>>> structure")
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This was a manual backport of a v4.12 patch to v4.11, looking now, I
> >>>>> see it should be in +v4.11.5 so that probably isn't your problem ...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> * c81be52a3ac0 ("audit: fix a race condition with the auditd tracking
> >>>>> code")
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This patch is relatively new and was just sent up to Linus during the
> >>>>> next merge window; it's a race condition fix so reproducing it can be
> >>>>> tricky, although it may be easily reproducible on your system at the
> >>>>> moment (luck you!). If you aren't in a position to apply the patch,
> >>>>> the workaround is rather simple: restart auditd.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If none of the above works, let me know, but I strongly suspect you're
> >>>>> tripping over the race condition fixed in that last patch.
> >>>>
> >>>> I didn't test the patch yet, but I restarted the auditd daemon 2 times
> >>>> and after that the queue has been flushed and I got all the message since
> >>>> this noon in the audit logs.
> >>>
> >>> That sounds right; I'm guessing the patch above should be a more
> >>> permanent fix.
> >>
> >> The patch should be applied in 4.13-rc7 right?
> >>
> >> It seems to fix the main issue (all the audit messages being logged in
> >> dmesg) but I can still see from time to time the following message:
> >>
> >> [ 14.747565] audit: audit_lost=59 audit_rate_limit=0
> >> audit_backlog_limit=64 [ 14.747566] audit: kauditd hold queue overflow
> >
> > That is a very low backlog_limit. Is this during boot?
>
> Yes that's during boot (64 is the kernel's default)
>
> In my audit.rules I have '-b 8192'
OK. I blogged about this issue back in May:
http://security-plus-data-science.blogspot.com/2017/05/a-suggested-change-for-rhel-7-disa-stig.html
TL;DR, you have to set a boot command line option
audit_backlog_limit=8192. I'm also starting to wonder if we can set the
backlog to 6144 now that auditd runs much faster (~90x).
-Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-10 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-10 14:59 kauditd hold queue overflow in 4.11 Laurent Bigonville
2017-07-10 16:00 ` Paul Moore
2017-07-10 20:01 ` Laurent Bigonville
2017-07-10 22:23 ` Paul Moore
2017-09-09 10:02 ` Laurent Bigonville
2017-09-09 14:22 ` Steve Grubb
2017-09-09 20:41 ` Laurent Bigonville
2017-09-10 0:13 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2017-09-09 14:35 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7894043.DVPTJZrtqs@x2 \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=bigon@debian.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox