From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miloslav Trmac Subject: Re: Help on Audit Rules Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 07:29:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <828811055.16612275.1350559745320.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx4-phx2.redhat.com (mx02.colomx.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.7.2]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9IBT5Ru027340 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 07:29:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: "Koresh..." Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com ----- Original Message ----- > So my question is why normal users audit event logs cant be captured > as a "type=USER_TTY" , where as root logs can be captured > similarway. USER_TTY is sent by the process that accepts the keyboard input. Unprivileged users are not allowed to send audit records (otherwise they would be able to fill the queue and/or the log partition, causing a DoS), so the USER_TTY record is discarded. Even for unprivileged users you should have the type=TTY records, although they are noticeably more difficult to interpret. Mirek