From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: intrigeri <intrigeri@debian.org>
Subject: Bug#759604: Any problem with making auditd log readable by the adm group?
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 11:07:42 +0200
Message-ID: <851t5a9t7l.fsf@boum.org>
References: <85futrf3ts.fsf@boum.org> <3693067.BeXgSpU3qL@x2>
Reply-To: intrigeri <intrigeri@debian.org>, 759604@bugs.debian.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <bounce-debian-bugs-dist=glddb-debian-bugs-dist=m.gmane.org@lists.debian.org>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.759604.B759604.14628712953621@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <3693067.BeXgSpU3qL@x2> (Steve Grubb's message of "Mon, 09 May
	2016 15:33:16 -0400")
List-URL: <https://lists.debian.org/debian-bugs-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe>
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, 759604@bugs.debian.org
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

Steve Grubb wrote (09 May 2016 19:33:16 GMT) :
> On Monday, May 09, 2016 09:07:11 PM intrigeri wrote:
>> in Debian, the convention for many log files is to make them readable
>> by members of the adm group. We're considering doing the same for the
>> auditd logs, in order to make apparmor-notify work out-of-the-box.
>> 
>> The maintainer of auditd in Debian would like to know what's your take
>> on it. What kind of problem could be created if we did that?

> I can't think of any problems.

Thanks for your input!

Cheers,