From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Casey Schaufler Subject: Audit, LSM, SELinux, and Smack Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:19:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <916629.84605.qm@web36613.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Reply-To: casey@schaufler-ca.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [10.255.15.25]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l6PKJYZ9010797 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:19:34 -0400 Received: from web36613.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web36613.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.85.30]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id l6PKJWWB016980 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:19:33 -0400 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: sgrubb@redhat.com, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, sds@tycho.nsa.gov Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com I'm looking at getting audit into my Smack LSM module. Stephen Smalley has suggested, and I concur, that this may be the time to convert audit from using SELinux specific interfaces to LSM based interfaces. Before I start blasting away with patches, I want to check and see if anyone else is looking into this. There's a good chunk of work to be done for LSM, audit, SELinux, and Smack. I also want to be sure that no one will take umberage with the notion. Thank you. Casey Schaufler casey@schaufler-ca.com