From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] Audit: internally use the new LSM audit hooks
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 15:15:47 +1100 (EST)
Message-ID: <Xine.LNX.4.64.0803041514090.14650@us.intercode.com.au>
References: <20080301194752.GA19636@ubuntu> <20080301200111.GH19636@ubuntu>
 <200803031851.41978.paul.moore@hp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Return-path: <linux-security-module-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <200803031851.41978.paul.moore@hp.com>
Sender: linux-security-module-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
Cc: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@gmail.com>, Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>, Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>, Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>, Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Audit-ML <linux-audit@redhat.com>, Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>, LSM-ML <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Paul Moore wrote:

> I've looked over patches #7, #8, and #9 and they look okay to me, but 
> I'm not tagging them 'Reviewed-by' because they go beyond areas of the 
> kernel that I feel comfortable reviewing at this point.

Indeed, deep audit patches need to be acked by the likes of Al Viro (cc'd, 
who possibly should also be added to the MAINTAINERS entry for audit).


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>