From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/8] integrity
Date: Fri,  6 Feb 2009 14:52:05 -0500
Message-ID: <cover.1233946566.git.zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n16Jxjtx020424
	for <linux-audit@redhat.com>; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:59:45 -0500
Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com (e4.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.144])
	by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n16JxPZ6001891
	for <linux-audit@redhat.com>; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:59:25 -0500
Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234])
	by e4.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n16JvRgo019970
	for <linux-audit@redhat.com>; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:57:27 -0500
Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216])
	by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id
	n16JxOeJ164094
	for <linux-audit@redhat.com>; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:59:24 -0500
Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id
	n16JwLnP027305
	for <linux-audit@redhat.com>; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:58:21 -0500
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: David Safford <safford@watson.ibm.com>
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

> > The integrity patches are in security-testing-2.6/#next and the auditd
> > patch I just posted to linux-audit. How do you suggest we go forward?
> 
> We need to go over the event format and make sure its got everything we need 
> in it. We also need to review the code that touches the audit system and make 
> sure its using the audit API the way we intended. I'd like to do this on the 
> linux-audit mail list so there is a record of it in the audit archives.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Steve

As per Steve's request, I'm posting the integrity patches here. These
patches are dependent on the following TPM patches:
	http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/2/162
	http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/5/151

The auditd patch was already posted here.

Mimi

James Morris (1):
  IMA: fix ima_delete_rules() definition

Mimi Zohar (7):
  integrity: IMA hooks
  integrity: IMA as an integrity service provider
  integrity: IMA display
  integrity: IMA policy
  integrity: IMA policy open
  Integrity: IMA file free imbalance
  Integrity: IMA update maintainers