From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Klaus Heinrich Kiwi <klausk@br.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/07][RFC] RACF audit plugin
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:42:50 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <fdjlfq$bjs$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <1190986087.4113.49.camel@klausk.br.ibm.com>
	<200709281447.18900.sgrubb@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l8SJm305006823
	for <linux-audit@redhat.com>; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:48:03 -0400
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
	by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l8SJludd006554
	for <linux-audit@redhat.com>; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:47:57 -0400
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IbLlD-0006C1-N5
	for linux-audit@redhat.com; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:44:27 +0000
Received: from 32.104.18.243 ([32.104.18.243])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <linux-audit@redhat.com>; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:44:27 +0000
Received: from klausk by 32.104.18.243 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <linux-audit@redhat.com>; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:44:27 +0000
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:47:18 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:

> Thanks for this patch Klaus. I'll see about integrating it. What
> platforms should this be enabled for? All or something specific? IOW if
> this was built on i386, would it be used?
>=20

Steve,
 despite the RACF server being z/OS only, pretty much any arch can=20
benefit from audit event consolidation, so I'd suggest enabling it to all=
=20
archs. In my development env, I've successfully tested it in x86_64 and=20
s390x.

Thanks,

 Klaus K.