From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ramsdell@mitre.org (John D. Ramsdell)
Subject: Re: Clone and fcntl64 flags patch
Date: 23 Jul 2007 09:40:50 -0400
Message-ID: <ogtlkd7z199.fsf@oolong.mitre.org>
References: <ogtzm1nz6mt.fsf_-_@oolong.mitre.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <ogtzm1nz6mt.fsf_-_@oolong.mitre.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: sgrubb@redhat.com
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

ramsdell@mitre.org (John D. Ramsdell) writes:

> I still haven't figured out why the auparse library prints getdents
> when strace print getdents64.

There is no bug in auparse when it comes to printing getdents.  I
misread the strace output.  It is printing getdents, not getdents64,
just as is auparse.  My strace analysis programs looked for
getdents64, not getdents.  I guess there was a time when the 64 bit
version of the system call was in use, but it doesn't seem to be used
now.

John