From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Paul B. Henson" Subject: RE: bcache not working on large files? Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 19:06:28 -0700 Message-ID: <0cde01cecf94$7dccdb50$796691f0$@acm.org> References: <20131022070830.GA20286@euve30603.vserver.de> <5266B774.6040202@rolffokkens.nl> <20131022180316.GA24473@euve30603.vserver.de> <1382476284.36900.YahooMailNeo@web181506.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20131022214553.GC26186@euve30603.vserver.de> <1382480829.46079.YahooMailNeo@web181504.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1382480829.46079.YahooMailNeo-XYahOdtEMNkbWpotXP+qY5OW+3bF1jUfVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> Content-Language: en-us Sender: linux-bcache-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: 'matthew patton' , 'Dirk Geschke' Cc: linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org > From: matthew patton > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 3:27 PM > > 'busted' in this case means errors on write. If the device disappears and is no > longer readable, then sure any un-committed blocks are gone and your > filesystem/file is broken. In other words, if you care about your data, don't use a nonredundant cache device in writeback mode 8-/. I'm tentatively planning to use an md mirror of two 256G SSD's to front end a raid10 of 4 2TB HD's, I'm still in the investigate stage but hopefully will get to prototyping soon. > If you're not running kernel 3.11.5 (or 3.11.4 with *all* the bcache fixes) > you're wasting your time. Is there an intention to port all of these fixes back to an LTS 3.10 kernel, or if you're going to run in production you're pretty much committed to the latest stable? Thanks.