From: Mark Hills <mark-UrrBsZIrrsb10XsdtD+oqA@public.gmane.org>
To: linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] Use exported call to up/down read
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 14:45:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1315662339-3115-1-git-send-email-mark@pogo.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1109101110320.2733-4jfXtw+jRJ582hYKe6nXyg@public.gmane.org>
When building bcache as a module, the following errors are silenced
by this patch:
ERROR: "call_rwsem_down_read_failed" [block/bcache.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "call_rwsem_wake" [block/bcache.ko] undefined!
There may be implications of the extra code introduced by this, but
I am not familiar with these functions. Though I can confirm that
the resulting build seems to work.
---
block/bcache.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/bcache.c b/block/bcache.c
index a2dbd1e..faaf75e 100644
--- a/block/bcache.c
+++ b/block/bcache.c
@@ -5561,7 +5561,7 @@ static void bio_complete(struct closure *cl)
keylist_free(&s->op.keys);
if (s->op.insert_type & INSERT_WRITE)
- __up_read(&d->writeback_lock);
+ up_read(&d->writeback_lock);
if (s->cache_bio) {
int i;
@@ -5911,7 +5911,7 @@ static void request_write(struct search *s)
s->cl.fn = bio_complete;
s->op.insert_type = INSERT_WRITE;
check_should_skip(s);
- __down_read(&s->op.d->writeback_lock);
+ down_read(&s->op.d->writeback_lock);
if (in_writeback(s->op.d, bio->bi_sector, bio_sectors(bio))) {
s->skip = false;
--
1.7.4.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-10 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-10 13:44 First observations with bcache Mark Hills
[not found] ` <1109101110320.2733-4jfXtw+jRJ582hYKe6nXyg@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-10 13:45 ` Mark Hills [this message]
[not found] ` <1315662339-3115-1-git-send-email-mark-UrrBsZIrrsb10XsdtD+oqA@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-10 13:45 ` [PATCH 2/7] Provide 64-bit arithmetic functions Mark Hills
2011-09-10 13:45 ` [PATCH 3/7] Break fuzz test to allow building as module Mark Hills
2011-09-10 13:45 ` [PATCH 4/7] Don't require linkage against closure_lock Mark Hills
2011-09-10 13:45 ` [PATCH 5/7] Allow closure debugging without CONFIG_DEBUG_FS Mark Hills
2011-09-10 13:45 ` [PATCH 6/7] Temporary fix to pr_latency() Mark Hills
2011-09-10 13:45 ` [PATCH 7/7] Don't require latency_warn_ms from bcache_util.o Mark Hills
2011-09-10 21:39 ` [PATCH 1/7] Use exported call to up/down read Kent Overstreet
2011-09-22 6:13 ` First observations with bcache Kent Overstreet
2011-09-22 23:14 ` Mark Hills
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1315662339-3115-1-git-send-email-mark@pogo.org.uk \
--to=mark-urrbszirrsb10xsdtd+oqa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox