Linux bcache driver list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>,
	"linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org" <linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Request For Suggestion: how to handle udevd timeout for bcache registration
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 09:08:40 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <140de6d9-b5ff-0736-ddbd-5b9e1ae70f5b@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c92cd67-8e62-7d55-c520-345c30513bfa@suse.de>

On 4/23/20 5:23 AM, Coly Li wrote:
> Hi folk,
> 
> I want to listen to your suggestion on how to handle the udevd timeout
> for bcache registration.
> 
> First of all let me introduce the background of this timeout problem.
> 
> Now the bcache registration is synchronized, the registering process
> will be blocked until the whole registration done. In boot up time, such
> registration can be initiated from a bcache udev rule. Normally it won't
> be problem, but for very large cached data size there might be a large
> internal btree on the cache device. During the registration checking all
> the btree nodes may take 50+ minutes as a udev task, it exceeds 180
> seconds timeout and udevd will kill it. The killing signal will make
> kthread_create() fail during bcache initialization, then the automatic
> bcache registration in boot up time will fail.
> 
> The above text describes the problem I need to solve: make boot up time
> automatic bache registration always success no mater how long it will take.
> 
> I know there are several solutions to solve such problem, I do
> appreciate if you may share the solution so that I may learn good ideas
> from them.
> 
> Thank you in advance for the information sharing of my request of
> suggestion.

The way I see it, you have only two choices:

1) Make the registration async (or lazy), so that starting the device is
   fast, but the btree verification happens on-demand or in the
   background.

2) Increase udev timeout.

That's about it, I don't think there's any clever tricks to be had, and
I definitely don't want to go down the path of trying to work around the
udev killing in the kernel.

-- 
Jens Axboe

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-23 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-23 11:23 Request For Suggestion: how to handle udevd timeout for bcache registration Coly Li
2020-04-23 15:08 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-04-24  8:57   ` Coly Li
2020-04-24  9:49     ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=140de6d9-b5ff-0736-ddbd-5b9e1ae70f5b@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=colyli@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox