From: Joshua Schmid <jschmid@suse.com>
To: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Subject: [PATCH] bcache: fix a livelock in btree lock
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 12:21:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1422962468-25011-1-git-send-email-jschmid@suse.com> (raw)
From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
This commit tries to fix a livelock in bcache. This livelock might
happen when we causes a huge number of cache misses simultaneously.
When we get a cache miss, bcache will execute the following path.
->cached_dev_make_request()
->cached_dev_read()
->cached_lookup()
->bch->btree_map_keys()
->btree_root() <------------------------
->bch_btree_map_keys_recurse() |
->cache_lookup_fn() |
->cached_dev_cache_miss() |
->bch_btree_insert_check_key() -|
[If btree->seq is not equal to seq + 1, we should return
EINTR and traverse btree again.]
In bch_btree_insert_check_key() function we first need to check upgrade
flag (op->lock == -1), and when this flag is true we need to release
read btree->lock and try to take write btree->lock. During taking and
releasing this write lock, btree->seq will be monotone increased in
order to prevent other threads modify this in cache miss (see btree.h:74).
But if there are some cache misses caused by some requested, we could
meet a livelock because btree->seq is always changed by others. Thus no
one can make progress.
This commit will try to take write btree->lock if it encounters a race
when we traverse btree. Although it sacrifice the scalability but we
can ensure that only one can modify the btree.
Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Tested-by: Joshua Schmid <jschmid@suse.com>
---
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
index 218f21a..f1c224f 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
@@ -2163,8 +2163,10 @@ int bch_btree_insert_check_key(struct btree *b, struct btree_op *op,
rw_lock(true, b, b->level);
if (b->key.ptr[0] != btree_ptr ||
- b->seq != seq + 1)
+ b->seq != seq + 1) {
+ op->lock = b->c->root->level + 1;
goto out;
+ }
}
SET_KEY_PTRS(check_key, 1);
--
2.1.2
next reply other threads:[~2015-02-03 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-03 11:21 Joshua Schmid [this message]
2015-02-04 3:00 ` [PATCH] bcache: fix a livelock in btree lock Zhu Yanhai
2015-02-25 12:11 ` Zheng Liu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-10-18 12:51 Zheng Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1422962468-25011-1-git-send-email-jschmid@suse.com \
--to=jschmid@suse.com \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wenqing.lz@taobao.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox