linux-bcache.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
	linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: [PATCH resend] bcache: prevent crash on changing writeback_running
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:10:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1436537456-17338-1-git-send-email-stefan.bader@canonical.com> (raw)

I sent this out quite a while ago. Back then it was said that it
was applied to the development tree. But it seems it never made its
way upstream. 
I re-tested with a 4.0.7 kernel and compared this against a 4.0 kernel
with this patch applied. Still it is possible to trigger a NULL pointer
violation when writing 0 into writeback_running of a bcache device that
is not attached to a cache set (without the patch).

-Stefan


---

From e949c64fa6acbdaab999410250855a6a4fc6bad1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 20:00:13 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] bcache: prevent crash on changing writeback_running

commit a664d0f05a2e ("bcache: fix crash on shutdown in passthrough mode")

added a safeguard in the shutdown case. At least while not being
attached it is also possible to trigger a kernel bug by writing into
writeback_running. This change  adds the same check before trying to
wake up the thread for that case.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h
index 0a9dab1..073a042 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h
@@ -63,7 +63,8 @@ static inline bool should_writeback(struct cached_dev *dc, struct bio *bio,
 
 static inline void bch_writeback_queue(struct cached_dev *dc)
 {
-	wake_up_process(dc->writeback_thread);
+	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dc->writeback_thread))
+		wake_up_process(dc->writeback_thread);
 }
 
 static inline void bch_writeback_add(struct cached_dev *dc)
-- 
1.9.1

                 reply	other threads:[~2015-07-10 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1436537456-17338-1-git-send-email-stefan.bader@canonical.com \
    --to=stefan.bader@canonical.com \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).