From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kent Overstreet Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/12] block: Generalized bio pool freeing Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 17:26:53 -0700 Message-ID: <20120809002653.GF7262@moria.home.lan> References: <1344290921-25154-1-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> <1344290921-25154-2-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> <20120808222515.GE6983@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120808222515.GE6983@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, agk@redhat.com, neilb@suse.de, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, mpatocka@redhat.com, sage@newdream.net, yehuda@hq.newdream.net List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:25:15PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:08:30PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > @@ -422,7 +409,11 @@ void bio_put(struct bio *bio) > > if (atomic_dec_and_test(&bio->bi_cnt)) { > > bio_disassociate_task(bio); > > bio->bi_next = NULL; > > - bio->bi_destructor(bio); > > + > > + if (bio->bi_pool) > > + bio_free(bio, bio->bi_pool); > > + else > > + bio->bi_destructor(bio); > > So, this bi_pool overriding caller specified custom bi_destructor is > rather unusual. I know why it's like that - the patch series is > gradually replacing bi_destructor with bi_pool and removes > bi_destructor eventually, but it would be far better if at least patch > description says why this is unusual like this. Ok, I'll stick a comment in there: if (atomic_dec_and_test(&bio->bi_cnt)) { bio_disassociate_task(bio); bio->bi_next = NULL; /* * This if statement is temporary - bi_pool is replacing * bi_destructor, but bi_destructor will be taken out in another * patch. */ if (bio->bi_pool) bio_free(bio, bio->bi_pool); else bio->bi_destructor(bio); } > > Thanks. > > -- > tejun