* 4K sectors @ 2012-08-13 7:19 James Harper [not found] ` <6035A0D088A63A46850C3988ED045A4B299F682F-mzsoxcrO4/2UD0RQwgcqbDSf8X3wrgjD@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: James Harper @ 2012-08-13 7:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org I notice on my system that bcache presents 4K sectors to Linux. This is causing me problems with Windows on Xen using my PV drivers (problem = doesn't work). I haven't figured out if it's my PV drivers that don't tell Windows the right thing, or if Windows just doesn't like 4K sectors. Is the 4K sector thing intentional? I assume there is a performance improvement in doing so. And what would be the performance impact if I just told Windows that it was dealing with 512 byte sectors (eg fake it)? Thanks James ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <6035A0D088A63A46850C3988ED045A4B299F682F-mzsoxcrO4/2UD0RQwgcqbDSf8X3wrgjD@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: 4K sectors [not found] ` <6035A0D088A63A46850C3988ED045A4B299F682F-mzsoxcrO4/2UD0RQwgcqbDSf8X3wrgjD@public.gmane.org> @ 2012-08-13 21:12 ` Kent Overstreet 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Kent Overstreet @ 2012-08-13 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: James Harper; +Cc: linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 07:19:50AM +0000, James Harper wrote: > I notice on my system that bcache presents 4K sectors to Linux. This is causing me problems with Windows on Xen using my PV drivers (problem = doesn't work). I haven't figured out if it's my PV drivers that don't tell Windows the right thing, or if Windows just doesn't like 4K sectors. > > Is the 4K sector thing intentional? I assume there is a performance improvement in doing so. It is intentional, but it's configurable. It's mainly for devices that don't support < 4k writes; there might also be a performance impact with some SSDs but I'm sure it's slight. You'll need to reformat - pass --block 512 to make-bcache. The backing devices need to be reformatted too, but just rerunning make-bcache won't touch any of the existing data. > > And what would be the performance impact if I just told Windows that it was dealing with 512 byte sectors (eg fake it)? > > Thanks > > James > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-13 21:12 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-08-13 7:19 4K sectors James Harper [not found] ` <6035A0D088A63A46850C3988ED045A4B299F682F-mzsoxcrO4/2UD0RQwgcqbDSf8X3wrgjD@public.gmane.org> 2012-08-13 21:12 ` Kent Overstreet
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).