From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lars Ellenberg Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/26] block: Add bio_end_sector() Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:54:52 +0200 Message-ID: <20120925115452.GF8143@soda.linbit> References: <1348526106-17074-1-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> <1348526106-17074-7-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1348526106-17074-7-git-send-email-koverstreet-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: drbd-dev-bounces-cunTk1MwBs8qoQakbn7OcQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: drbd-dev-bounces-cunTk1MwBs8qoQakbn7OcQ@public.gmane.org To: Kent Overstreet Cc: axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org, linux-s390-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Chris Mason , dm-devel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, neilb-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org, Jiri Kosina , Heiko Carstens , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, Martin Schwidefsky , Steven Whitehouse , Alasdair Kergon , Lars Ellenberg List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:34:46PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > Just a little convenience macro - main reason to add it now is preparing > for immutable bio vecs, it'll reduce the size of the patch that puts > bi_sector/bi_size/bi_idx into a struct bvec_iter. For the DRBD part: > diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c > index 01b2ac6..d90a1fd 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c > +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c > @@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ void drbd_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio) > /* to make some things easier, force alignment of requests within the > * granularity of our hash tables */ > s_enr = bio->bi_sector >> HT_SHIFT; > - e_enr = bio->bi_size ? (bio->bi_sector+(bio->bi_size>>9)-1) >> HT_SHIFT : s_enr; > + e_enr = (bio_end_sector(bio) - 1) >> HT_SHIFT; You ignored the bio->bi_size ? : ; #define bio_end_sector(bio) ((bio)->bi_sector + bio_sectors(bio)) which turns out (bio->bi_sector + (bio->bi_size >> 9)) Note that bi_size may be 0, bio_end_sector(bio)-1 then is bi_sector -1, for an empty flush with bi_sector == 0, this ends up as (sector_t)-1ULL, and this code path breaks horribly. + e_enr = bio->bi_size ? (bio_end_sector(bio) - 1) >> HT_SHIFT : s_enr; Thanks, Lars