From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thornber-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Subject: Re: [dm-devel] Announcement: STEC EnhanceIO SSD caching software for Linux kernel Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:11:36 +0000 Message-ID: <20130118161135.GA3118@raspberrypi> References: <20130116104546.GA3869@raspberrypi> <20130117132620.GA2438@raspberrypi> <50F844A3.9020300@warr.net> <50F970A3.4000403@warr.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50F970A3.4000403-/cow75dQlsI@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-bcache-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jason Warr Cc: Amit Kale , device-mapper development , "kent.overstreet-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" , Mike Snitzer , LKML , "linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 09:56:19AM -0600, Jason Warr wrote: > If I can help test and benchmark all three of these solutions please > ask. I have allot of hardware resources available to me and perhaps I > can add value from an outsiders perspective. We'd love your help. Perhaps you could devise a test that represents how you'd use it? - Joe