From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thornber-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Re: [dm-devel] Announcement: STEC EnhanceIO SSD caching software for Linux kernel Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:58:21 +0000 Message-ID: <20130121135821.GB4919@raspberrypi> References: <50F970A3.4000403@warr.net> <20130118161135.GA3118@raspberrypi> <50F97C0F.9010405@warr.net> <50F9963A.2080608@warr.net> <20130118212543.GB6425@blackbox.djwong.org> <20130118213759.GA30278@redhat.com> <20130121130951.GA16574@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130121130951.GA16574-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-bcache-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mike Snitzer Cc: Amit Kale , "Darrick J. Wong" , device-mapper development , "linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "kent.overstreet-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" , LKML , "lsf-pc-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org" , Joe Thornber List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 08:09:51AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > dm-cache is under active review for upstream inclusion. I wouldn't > categorize the chances of dm-cache going upstream when the v3.9 merge > window opens as "very low". But even if dm-cache does go upstream it > doesn't preclude bcache and/or enhanceio from going upstream too. As I understand it bcache is being reviewed too.