From: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Pierre Beck <debian-bugs-MZZvbRqs/9F0RdzJJlgK+g@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Loosing transactions
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:01:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130129190133.GL26407@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51068F01.9060000-MZZvbRqs/9F0RdzJJlgK+g@public.gmane.org>
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:45:23PM +0100, Pierre Beck wrote:
>
> >We probably want to start by simplifying/narrowing it down a bit - we
> >can eliminate the possibility of the disk having anything to do with it
> >and just use the SSD by forcing everything to writeback mode:
> >
> >For that you'll want to disable both sequential bypass (echo 0 >
> >/sys/block/bcache/bcacheN/sequential_cutoff) and the congested
> >thresholds -
> >echo 0 > /sys/fs/bcache/<cache set>/congested_read_threshold_us,
> >echo 0 > /sys/fs/bcache/<cache set>/congested_write_threshold_us
> >
> >After that (assuming you're also in writeback mode) all writes will be
> >writeback writes until the device is more than half full of dirty data.
> >
> >Can you check if transactions are still getting lost in that setup? If
> >so (I kind of expect they will be) we may have to do a bit of
> >blktracing, but that'll really narrow down the possibilities.
> >
>
> Yes, the most recent transactions are still lost.
Think I figured out what's going on. Just had a chat with another kernel
dev and figured out the flaw in my logic :P
This is going to take some thought to fix, though it shouldn't be much
code. I'll let you know when I think I have a fix.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-29 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-23 20:14 Loosing transactions Pierre Beck
[not found] ` <51004490.704-MZZvbRqs/9F0RdzJJlgK+g@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-24 23:35 ` Kent Overstreet
[not found] ` <20130124233559.GO26407-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-28 14:45 ` Pierre Beck
[not found] ` <51068F01.9060000-MZZvbRqs/9F0RdzJJlgK+g@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-29 19:01 ` Kent Overstreet [this message]
[not found] ` <20130129190133.GL26407-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-29 19:09 ` Kent Overstreet
[not found] ` <20130129190942.GM26407-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-29 20:16 ` Pierre Beck
[not found] ` <51082E02.7000908-MZZvbRqs/9F0RdzJJlgK+g@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-30 19:02 ` Kent Overstreet
[not found] ` <20130130190220.GS26407-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-30 20:05 ` Pierre Beck
[not found] ` <51097D0A.6040204-MZZvbRqs/9F0RdzJJlgK+g@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-30 20:18 ` Kent Overstreet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130129190133.GL26407@google.com \
--to=koverstreet-hpiqsd4aklfqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=debian-bugs-MZZvbRqs/9F0RdzJJlgK+g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox