From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thornber-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Subject: Re: [RFC] [DONOTAPPLY] [PATCH] enhanceio: STEC EnhanceIO SSD caching software for Linux kernel Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:40:17 +0000 Message-ID: <20130204144016.GA2522@raspberrypi> References: <20130202004459.GA4760@blackbox.djwong.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130202004459.GA4760-yuuUpGxbzT9UbpRmUfBrXUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-bcache-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Amit Kale , linux-bcache , device-mapper development , Kent Overstreet , Mike Snitzer , LKML , Jason Warr List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 04:44:59PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > I will start reviewing the code as soon as this patch posts. Be warned that I > haven't even compile tested this yet. :) Has the code been updated since I looked at it a couple of weeks ago? For example addressing all the 'sparse' warnings? If you've not compiled or reviewed this code, what do you mean by the 'signed-off by' tag? - Joe