From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kent Overstreet Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Re: [dm-devel] Announcement: STEC EnhanceIO SSD caching software for Linux kernel Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 12:33:26 -0800 Message-ID: <20130204203326.GA21532@google.com> References: <50F844A3.9020300@warr.net> <50F970A3.4000403@warr.net> <20130118161135.GA3118@raspberrypi> <50F97C0F.9010405@warr.net> <50F9963A.2080608@warr.net> <20130118212543.GB6425@blackbox.djwong.org> <20130118213759.GA30278@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130118213759.GA30278@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Snitzer Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" , device-mapper development , Amit Kale , "linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org" , "kent.overstreet@gmail.com" , LKML , lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, Joe Thornber List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 04:37:59PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18 2013 at 4:25pm -0500, > Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > Since Joe is putting together a testing tree to compare the three caching > > things, what do you all think of having a(nother) session about ssd caching at > > this year's LSFMM Summit? > > > > [Apologies for hijacking the thread.] > > [Adding lsf-pc to the cc list.] > > Hopefully we'll have some findings on the comparisons well before LSF > (since we currently have some momentum). But yes it may be worthwhile > to discuss things further and/or report findings. I'd be willing to go and talk a bit about bcache. Curious to hear more about the dm caching stuff, too.