From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kent Overstreet Subject: Re: bcache: BUG in fuzz testing without devices Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 14:21:10 -0700 Message-ID: <20130405212110.GD15749@google.com> References: <515B056E.6010002@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <515B056E.6010002-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-bcache-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Sasha Levin Cc: NeilBrown , linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-raid-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 12:21:02PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > Hi all, > > It seems that trying to fuzz bcache without any devices triggers a BUG: > > That BUG looks very intentional there, any reason for adding it instead of exiting > if there aren't any devices? The fuzz tester is meant to stress test some of the btree code - it's a purely in memory test. But it looks like it's rotted - thanks for the bug report, I'll disable it for now.