From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Thornber Subject: Re: [dm-devel] bcache/dmcache/enhanceio bake-off Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 17:09:25 +0100 Message-ID: <20130413160925.GA5236@debian> References: <20130411072239.GD8910@blackbox.djwong.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130411072239.GD8910-yuuUpGxbzT9UbpRmUfBrXUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-bcache-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: device-mapper development Cc: Mike Snitzer , Kent Overstreet , Amit Kale , linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org Hi Darrick, On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:22:39AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Hi all, > > Lately I've been having some fun playing with bcache, dmcache, and enhanceio. I pushed some tweaks to the mq policy today to my thin-dev tree. They show some improvements to these fio based tests. In addition I've written a blog post trying to explain what's going on in dm-cache: http://device-mapper.org/blog/2013/04/13/benchmarking-dm-cache-with-fio/ - Joe