From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kent Overstreet Subject: Re: bcache disabled due to inconsistent ptrs Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 12:13:05 -0700 Message-ID: <20130729191305.GB13280@kmo-pixel> References: <20130728233757.GB6653@moria.home.lan> <20130728235259.GC6653@moria.home.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-bcache-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: sheng qiu Cc: linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 06:57:42PM -0500, sheng qiu wrote: > generally the flash size is 40GB, RAM is 8GB. The workload first > writes about 65GB of data and then do read/writes (10 threads) on > those data. > it runs less than 1 hour during the read/write step and nearly > happened each time. now i was testing with less threads and see if > this is the case. Some kind of garbage collection bug... :/ Could you try the bcache-testing branch? It's got significantly improved garbage collection code - if it's not fixed there, at least that code should be easier to debug...