From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kent Overstreet Subject: Re: bcache hang on suspend? sometimes? Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 14:02:24 -0700 Message-ID: <20130806210224.GA8519@kmo-pixel> References: <20130806053403.GB7998@blackbox.djwong.org> <20130806205650.GA5878@blackbox.djwong.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130806205650.GA5878-yuuUpGxbzT9UbpRmUfBrXUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-bcache-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: kent.overstreet-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:56:50PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Ok, I've narrowed it down a little bit -- > > It's not caused by any of the fixes that went into 3.10.[1-5]. It doesn't seem > to be specific to any particular storage bus, controller, disk, or even cache > set -- the same bcache'd usb stick will crash my laptop and not crash my test > box. The 4k/512b sector thing was a red herring; you can ignore that. Ok, that makes more sense... > The test box is a boring old Core2 box; the laptop is an Ivy Bridge. I'll try > to enable more verbose PM debugging to see if I can determine what exactly's > going on at sleep time. (Again, shooting in the dark...) I just looked at the code and it appears there was a freezer fix that didn't make it into 3.10 and should have. Can you try the bcache-for-3.11 branch and see if that fixes it? If so, I'll get that patch sent out for stable.