From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: Bcache fixes for stable Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 17:47:43 -0700 Message-ID: <20130827004743.GA27241@kroah.com> References: <20130826220249.GF2798@kmo-pixel> <20130826221957.GA2782@kroah.com> <20130826232333.GA11778@moria.home.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130826232333.GA11778-jC9Py7bek1znysI04z7BkA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-bcache-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Kent Overstreet Cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:23:33PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 03:19:57PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 03:02:49PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > > Two fixes that went into 3.11 should've been marked for stable, but I > > > screwed up and forgot to mark them. > > > > > > One of them fixes bugs that appear to being hit in the wild, so please > > > pull these: > > > > > > The following changes since commit 0a4b6d4ff200a553951f77f765971cb3e4c91ec0: > > > > > > Linux 3.10.9 (2013-08-20 15:40:47 -0700) > > > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > > > git://evilpiepirate.org/~kent/linux-bcache.git bcache-for-3.10 > > > > > > for you to fetch changes up to a213846fafcdf52153dfebf8b1671498a72b6285: > > > > > > bcache: FUA fixes (2013-08-26 14:56:52 -0700) > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Kent Overstreet (1): > > > bcache: FUA fixes > > > > > > Kumar Amit Mehta (1): > > > md: bcache: io.c: fix a potential NULL pointer dereference > > > > Can I get a hint as to what the git commit ids of these patches are in > > Linus's tree? > > 5c694129c8db6d89c9be109049a16510b2f70f6d > e49c7c374e7aacd1f04ecbc21d9dbbeeea4a77d6 > > > Ideally, that's all you need to send me, but if you want to send me a > > git pull, that's fine too, but please use a signed tag, otherwise it's > > just a random tree... > > *nod* I need to get some more signatures on my gpg key... > > > Also, if you do a git pull, I need the git commit ids in the changelog > > entry that match Linus's tree, so people (like me) can verify things. > > Ok, I'll remember that for the future. > > > For now, I can edit these two patches and add them in, if you give me > > the git commit ids to verify them. > > Ok - I don't care too much either way but there were some slightly > nontrivial conflicts on the second patch, and the one I did backported > has been tested. Thanks, I took your second patch, and the first patch directly from Linus's tree, and added them to the 3.10-stable queue. greg k-h