From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: [RFC] bcache-status Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 17:46:46 -0700 Message-ID: <20130829004646.GA3099@blackbox.djwong.org> References: <521A55D4.20908@rolffokkens.nl> <521A6B92.60001@rolffokkens.nl> <20130826163055.GB4780@blackbox.djwong.org> <521BBC3B.9010003@rolffokkens.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <521BBC3B.9010003-6w2rdlBuEQTpMFipWq+H6g@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-bcache-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Rolf Fokkens Cc: linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:36:11PM +0200, Rolf Fokkens wrote: > On 08/26/2013 06:30 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999690#c12 > > > >I have a few questions/remarks: > >- Is the python3 dependency really needed? I changed it to ordinary > >python(2) and it runs fine I think. > >Not required; I'm merely writing new scripts in python3. (At least when I can > >find py3 libraries...) I didn't write anything py3-specific, as far as I know. > Would you consider putting python in the header instead of python3? > Having python3 in the heading adds the requirement to install > python3, and I think python2 is (still) more standard. For Fedora 20 > I think it is anyway, which means I have to patch it everytime I > want to package it. Sure. Go ahead and take the '3' out of hashbang. (Gist updated.) --D > >For now, there's: https://gist.github.com/djwong/6343451 in which I've merged > >all the changes made by the two people who (thank you both!) provided > >modifications. > > > >Yeah, I fixed that before posting the gist. :) --D > Thanks, I'll update the package! >