From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kent Overstreet Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcache: Possible flush fix Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 13:43:03 -0700 Message-ID: <20130918204303.GC19161@kmo-pixel> References: <20130917020316.GC10907@kmo-pixel> <20130917203741.GA32037@kmo-pixel> <20130917214043.GF32037@kmo-pixel> <20130918202809.GB19161@kmo-pixel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-bcache-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Hubert Kempkensteffen Cc: linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 08:39:10PM +0000, Hubert Kempkensteffen wrote: > Kent Overstreet writes: > > > > > I am currently testing the patch. (writethrough) > > > The kernel is: git clone http://evilpiepirate.org/git/linux-bcache.git > > > > What branch? > > > > I thing: Head bcache-3.10-stable > > I had also already tested 3,10,11. > The result was basically the same, but I had not enough time. > Early morning I can say more. I just rebased bcache-3.10-stable and added the fix you tested to it. Also, HEAD in the bcache repository now points to bcache-3.10-stable and not bcache-for-3.10. Can you run echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger when things get stuck, and give me the full dmesg output?