From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kent Overstreet Subject: Re: stable bcache-tools? Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 17:05:37 -0800 Message-ID: <20131124010537.GF20624@moria.home.lan> References: <002001cee7f2$0868a260$1939e720$@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]:57199 "EHLO mail-pd0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756201Ab3KXBEf (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Nov 2013 20:04:35 -0500 Received: by mail-pd0-f175.google.com with SMTP id w10so3222443pde.20 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 17:04:34 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002001cee7f2$0868a260$1939e720$@acm.org> Sender: linux-bcache-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org To: "Paul B. Henson" Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 06:16:23PM -0800, Paul B. Henson wrote: > Is there going to be a release cut of bcache-tools at some point so > distributions could have a stable version to package? Is the current git > head pretty much considered production ready and bug free? The current git head should be completely fine for production usage - there's not really anything complicated enough (save the udev stuff, maybe) to merit tagging a specific version as stable. I suppose distributions could use some kind of hint that useful changes have gone in and they should package a new version - anything in particular you want there?