From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kent Overstreet Subject: Re: 3.18.1 + latest bcache-dev Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 16:46:21 -0800 Message-ID: <20150104004621.GA4460@kmo-pixel> References: <20141228023534.GA25860@cuci.nl> <54A81B78.2070409@rolffokkens.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f173.google.com ([209.85.192.173]:49476 "EHLO mail-pd0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752039AbbADAnu (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jan 2015 19:43:50 -0500 Received: by mail-pd0-f173.google.com with SMTP id ft15so25739193pdb.4 for ; Sat, 03 Jan 2015 16:43:49 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54A81B78.2070409@rolffokkens.nl> Sender: linux-bcache-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org To: Rolf Fokkens Cc: Slava Pestov , "Stephen R. van den Berg" , linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 05:40:24PM +0100, Rolf Fokkens wrote: > Hi Slava, > > Sounds like the kernel (using bcache-dev) is not able to handle the current > format. If so, bcache-tools may help in "reformatting" bcache devices, but > that's no solution for existing systems. > > So is my understanding correct that there's no easy kernel upgrade path (to > bcache-dev) ? Yes, correct. The on disk format changes in bcache-dev are just too deep to feasibly write backwards compat code, unfortunately. And the on disk format is still in flux - for just a bit longer hopefully though, right now I'm working on a pretty major revamp that's getting close to done (self describing and packed metadata). This revamp is making the on disk format _much_ more flexible though, and cleaning up a lot of stuff at the same time.