From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kent Overstreet Subject: Re: 3.18.1 + latest bcache-dev Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 03:06:02 -0800 Message-ID: <20150105110602.GA31622@kmo-pixel> References: <20141228023534.GA25860@cuci.nl> <54A81B78.2070409@rolffokkens.nl> <20150104004621.GA4460@kmo-pixel> <20150105084919.GA11249@cuci.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.220.51]:60551 "EHLO mail-pa0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751541AbbAELDa (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jan 2015 06:03:30 -0500 Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id ey11so28533741pad.38 for ; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 03:03:29 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150105084919.GA11249@cuci.nl> Sender: linux-bcache-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org To: "Stephen R. van den Berg" Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 09:49:19AM +0100, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote: > Kent Overstreet wrote: > >Yes, correct. The on disk format changes in bcache-dev are just too deep to > >feasibly write backwards compat code, unfortunately. > > >And the on disk format is still in flux - for just a bit longer hopefully > >though, right now I'm working on a pretty major revamp that's getting close to > > Any chance we could get a git url of the bcache-tools-in-flux as well? Yeah, I just pushed the current (very much WIP) stuff to the bcache-dev branch under the main bcache-tools repo