From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Stephen R. van den Berg" Subject: Re: 3.18.1 + latest bcache-dev Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 10:16:25 +0100 Message-ID: <20150106091625.GA8154@cuci.nl> References: <20141228023534.GA25860@cuci.nl> <54A81B78.2070409@rolffokkens.nl> <20150104004621.GA4460@kmo-pixel> <20150105084919.GA11249@cuci.nl> <20150105110602.GA31622@kmo-pixel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from aristoteles.cuci.nl ([212.125.128.18]:47909 "EHLO aristoteles.cuci.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750846AbbAFJQ1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2015 04:16:27 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150105110602.GA31622@kmo-pixel> Sender: linux-bcache-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org To: Kent Overstreet Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org Kent Overstreet wrote: >On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 09:49:19AM +0100, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote: >> Kent Overstreet wrote: >> >Yes, correct. The on disk format changes in bcache-dev are just too deep to >> >feasibly write backwards compat code, unfortunately. >> >And the on disk format is still in flux - for just a bit longer hopefully >> >though, right now I'm working on a pretty major revamp that's getting close to >> Any chance we could get a git url of the bcache-tools-in-flux as well? >Yeah, I just pushed the current (very much WIP) stuff to the bcache-dev branch >under the main bcache-tools repo Maybe I'm not looking in the right spot, but I do not see that branch. What is the main bcache-tools repo? -- Stephen.