* 3.18.3 + latest bcache-dev @ 2015-01-21 1:24 Stephen R. van den Berg 2015-01-21 8:00 ` Kent Overstreet 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Stephen R. van den Berg @ 2015-01-21 1:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-bcache I have: 16GB RAM 16GB SSD swap 5 x 6TB HDD bcache backing storage 2 x 490GB SSD bcache cache (Crucial M550, 4KB block, 2M bucket size) writeback and trim enabled on bcache. I used the latestbcache tools from git. On the backing storage, I created a BTRFS using nossd and notrim. Now, whenever I boot, I end up with exactly 4 bcache_writebac processes pegged at 99 or 100% CPU. This is on an octocore cpu. top shows it as 50% system time. The four processes are marked as R, but I cannot trace them. Even after waiting for several minutes, the cpu load does not come down. The mounted volume simply seems to work, though. Any ideas? -- Stephen. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.18.3 + latest bcache-dev 2015-01-21 1:24 3.18.3 + latest bcache-dev Stephen R. van den Berg @ 2015-01-21 8:00 ` Kent Overstreet 2015-01-21 11:04 ` Stephen R. van den Berg 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Kent Overstreet @ 2015-01-21 8:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen R. van den Berg; +Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org Try increasing btree_scan_ratelimit? On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Stephen R. van den Berg <srb@cuci.nl> wrote: > I have: > 16GB RAM > 16GB SSD swap > 5 x 6TB HDD bcache backing storage > 2 x 490GB SSD bcache cache (Crucial M550, 4KB block, 2M bucket size) > writeback and trim enabled on bcache. > I used the latestbcache tools from git. > > On the backing storage, I created a BTRFS using nossd and notrim. > > Now, whenever I boot, I end up with exactly 4 bcache_writebac > processes pegged at 99 or 100% CPU. This is on an octocore cpu. > top shows it as 50% system time. The four processes are marked as R, > but I cannot trace them. > > Even after waiting for several minutes, the cpu load does not come down. > The mounted volume simply seems to work, though. > > Any ideas? > -- > Stephen. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.18.3 + latest bcache-dev 2015-01-21 8:00 ` Kent Overstreet @ 2015-01-21 11:04 ` Stephen R. van den Berg 2015-01-21 16:45 ` Stephen R. van den Berg 2015-01-21 22:47 ` 3.18.3 + latest bcache-dev Slava Pestov 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Stephen R. van den Berg @ 2015-01-21 11:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kent Overstreet; +Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org Kent Overstreet wrote: >Try increasing btree_scan_ratelimit? Well, before I could try this, the 100% CPU usage was gone (after several hours). However, something else happened: a. During some heavy traffic mostly writing to the btrfs filesystem the kernel halted. AFAICS inside some btrfs recovery code. b. Kernel messages show something like this leading up to the freeze: Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x7fffffff SErr 0x0 action 0x0 Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: irq_stat 0x40000008 Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: cmd 60/00:c0:10:d0:d9/04:00:01:00:00/40 tag 24 ncq 524288 in Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: res 41/40:00:d0:d1:d9/00:00:01:00:00/00 Emask 0x409 (media error) <F> Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: status: { DRDY ERR } Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: error: { UNC } Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: configured for UDMA/133 Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: sd 10:0:0:0: [sdg] Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: Result: hostbyte=0x00 driverbyte=0x08 Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: sd 10:0:0:0: [sdg] Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: Sense Key : 0x3 [current] [descriptor] Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: Descriptor sense data with sense descriptors (in hex): Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: 72 03 11 04 00 00 00 0c 00 0a 80 00 00 00 00 00 Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: 01 d9 d1 d0 Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: sd 10:0:0:0: [sdg] Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: ASC=0x11 ASCQ=0x4 Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: sd 10:0:0:0: [sdg] CDB: Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: cdb[0]=0x88: 88 00 00 00 00 00 01 d9 d0 10 00 00 04 00 00 00 Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sdg, sector 31052240 Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: ata11: EH complete Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: BTRFS: bdev /dev/bcache2 errs: wr 0, rd 1, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0 Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: BTRFS: bdev /dev/bcache2 errs: wr 0, rd 2, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0 Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: BTRFS: bdev /dev/bcache2 errs: wr 0, rd 3, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0 Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: BTRFS: bdev /dev/bcache2 errs: wr 0, rd 4, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0 Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: BTRFS: bdev /dev/bcache2 errs: wr 0, rd 5, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0 The above repeats like 10 times in 4 second intervals (more or less), and then a final: Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x7fffffff SErr 0x0 action 0x0 Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: irq_stat 0x40000008 Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: cmd 60/80:58:90:f2:da/01:00:01:00:00/40 tag 11 ncq 196608 in Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: res 41/40:00:90:f2:da/00:00:01:00:00/00 Emask 0x409 (media error) <F> Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: status: { DRDY ERR } Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: error: { UNC } Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: configured for UDMA/133 Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: sd 10:0:0:0: [sdg] Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: Result: hostbyte=0x00 driverbyte=0x08 Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: sd 10:0:0:0: [sdg] Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: Sense Key : 0x3 [current] [descriptor] Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: Descriptor sense data with sense descriptors (in hex): Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: 72 03 11 04 00 00 00 0c 00 0a 80 00 00 00 00 00 Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: 01 da f2 90 Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: sd 10:0:0:0: [sdg] Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: ASC=0x11 ASCQ=0x4 Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: sd 10:0:0:0: [sdg] CDB: Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: cdb[0]=0x88: 88 00 00 00 00 00 01 da f2 90 00 00 01 80 00 00 Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sdg, sector 31126160 Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: ata11: EH complete Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: BTRFS: bdev /dev/bcache2 errs: wr 0, rd 130, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0 Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: BTRFS: bdev /dev/bcache2 errs: wr 0, rd 131, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0 Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: BTRFS: bdev /dev/bcache2 errs: wr 0, rd 132, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0 Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: BTRFS: bdev /dev/bcache2 errs: wr 0, rd 133, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0 Jan 21 11:35:32 ip144 kernel: BTRFS: bdev /dev/bcache2 errs: wr 0, rd 134, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0 Jan 21 11:35:33 ip144 kernel: BTRFS: read error corrected: ino 318562 off 131932160 (dev /dev/bcache2 sector 31126160) Jan 21 11:35:33 ip144 kernel: BTRFS: read error corrected: ino 318562 off 131981312 (dev /dev/bcache2 sector 31126256) Jan 21 11:35:33 ip144 kernel: BTRFS: read error corrected: ino 318562 off 131936256 (dev /dev/bcache2 sector 31126168) Jan 21 11:35:33 ip144 kernel: BTRFS: read error corrected: ino 318562 off 131964928 (dev /dev/bcache2 sector 31126224) Jan 21 11:35:33 ip144 kernel: BTRFS: read error corrected: ino 318562 off 131923968 (dev /dev/bcache2 sector 31126144) Jan 21 11:35:33 ip144 kernel: BTRFS: read error corrected: ino 318562 off 131948544 (dev /dev/bcache2 sector 31126192) Jan 21 11:35:33 ip144 kernel: BTRFS: read error corrected: ino 318562 off 131944448 (dev /dev/bcache2 sector 31126184) Jan 21 11:35:33 ip144 kernel: BTRFS: read error corrected: ino 318562 off 131956736 (dev /dev/bcache2 sector 31126208) Jan 21 11:35:33 ip144 kernel: BTRFS: read error corrected: ino 318562 off 132001792 (dev /dev/bcache2 sector 31126296) Jan 21 11:35:33 ip144 kernel: BTRFS: read error corrected: ino 318562 off 132009984 (dev /dev/bcache2 sector 31126312) After that the system freezes with a kernel oops in btrfs land. c. Upon reboot, the kernel reports the following: Jan 21 11:43:46 ip144 kernel: bcache: register_cache() registered cache device sda3 Jan 21 11:43:46 ip144 kernel: bcache: register_cache() registered cache device sdb3 Jan 21 11:43:46 ip144 kernel: bcache: register_bdev() registered backing device sdg Jan 21 11:43:46 ip144 kernel: bcache: register_bdev() registered backing device sdc Jan 21 11:43:46 ip144 kernel: bcache: register_bdev() registered backing device sdf Jan 21 11:43:46 ip144 kernel: bcache: register_bdev() registered backing device sde Jan 21 11:43:46 ip144 kernel: bcache: register_bdev() registered backing device sdd Jan 21 11:43:46 ip144 kernel: bcache: error on 04063132-f7e1-4f29-a3aa-675491b426f4: sdb3: bad magic (got 17495323148306469098 expect 5629218783827753365) while reading prios from bucket 16868 Jan 21 11:43:46 ip144 kernel: bcache: register_bcache() error opening /dev/sdb3: error reading priorities Jan 21 11:43:46 ip144 kernel: bcache: bch_cache_read_only() sda3 read only Jan 21 11:43:46 ip144 kernel: bcache: bch_cache_read_only() sdb3 read only Jan 21 11:43:46 ip144 kernel: bcache: cache_set_free() Cache set 04063132-f7e1-4f29-a3aa-675491b426f4 unregistered Jan 21 11:43:46 ip144 kernel: bcache: bch_cache_release() sda3 removed Jan 21 11:43:46 ip144 kernel: bcache: bch_cache_release() sdb3 removed Now, the data on this filesystem is non-critical, so I could either attempt a repair or wipe and start over. Any suggestions? Writeback was on, so simply reformatting sdb3 most likely will result in mayhem. I should probably take out sdg and replace it with a drive without errors. -- Stephen. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.18.3 + latest bcache-dev 2015-01-21 11:04 ` Stephen R. van den Berg @ 2015-01-21 16:45 ` Stephen R. van den Berg 2015-01-22 12:33 ` patch (Re: 3.18.3 + latest bcache-dev) Stephen R. van den Berg 2015-01-21 22:47 ` 3.18.3 + latest bcache-dev Slava Pestov 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Stephen R. van den Berg @ 2015-01-21 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kent Overstreet; +Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org Well, what I did was: - Take out sdg. - Reformat both caching and backing devices and started over. I still have the kernel logs of the previous fault condition, but not the data anymore. What I notice are: - The 100% CPU usage for four bcache_writebac processes is back. I've already tried raising the value you suggested from 30 to 60, but I did not have an opportunity to reboot yet. Will report back on this. - When I run bcache-super-show on the backing devices, it works just fine. - When I run bcache-super-show on the caching devices (while in service) I get something like this: sb.magic ok sb.first_sector 8 [match] sb.csum FFFFFFFF5D55BF8D [expected 726D3B42D08769EC] Corrupt superblock (bad csum) On both caching devices. Is this to be expected? -- Stephen. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* patch (Re: 3.18.3 + latest bcache-dev) 2015-01-21 16:45 ` Stephen R. van den Berg @ 2015-01-22 12:33 ` Stephen R. van den Berg 2015-01-22 12:56 ` Stephen R. van den Berg 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Stephen R. van den Berg @ 2015-01-22 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kent Overstreet; +Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org Stephen R. van den Berg wrote: >What I notice are: >- The 100% CPU usage for four bcache_writebac processes is back. I've > already tried raising the value you suggested from 30 to 60, but I did > not have an opportunity to reboot yet. Will report back on this. What I saw: a. After running several hours, copying roughly 3.0TB through the two SSD caching devices onto the BTRFS backing device consisting of four HDDs, the bcache_writebac processes were still eating 100% CPU each. b. Then did a manual umount of the fs, then stopped the bcache device through the proc filesystem. c. Rebooted. d. Came back in a patched kernel, 100% CPU usage is gone. The patch I used (I did not investigate the correctness of the value picked, I simply doubled it as an initial guess): commit 2abecdbd214c94741012de32759bb0de4c6adbf9 Author: Stephen R. van den Berg <srb@cuci.nl> Date: Tue Jan 13 23:24:52 2015 +0100 Increase btree_scan_ratelimit to avoid 100% CPU hogging. diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c index 653419b..5fff8ad 100644 --- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c @@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ static struct cache_set *bch_cache_set_alloc(struct cache *ca) c->error_limit = 16 << IO_ERROR_SHIFT; c->tiering_percent = 10; - c->btree_scan_ratelimit = 30; + c->btree_scan_ratelimit = 60; c->copy_gc_enabled = 1; c->tiering_enabled = 1; -- Stephen. ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: patch (Re: 3.18.3 + latest bcache-dev) 2015-01-22 12:33 ` patch (Re: 3.18.3 + latest bcache-dev) Stephen R. van den Berg @ 2015-01-22 12:56 ` Stephen R. van den Berg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Stephen R. van den Berg @ 2015-01-22 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kent Overstreet; +Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org Stephen R. van den Berg wrote: >d. Came back in a patched kernel, 100% CPU usage is gone. I spoke too soon. After some more copying, the 100% CPU is back, but different: Before I had four or five HDDs, but in both cases I had four bcache_writebac processes running at 100%. Now I have four HDDs, and also four bcache_writebac processes, but only three of those run at 100% CPU. The fourth one is idle (mostly). -- Stephen. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.18.3 + latest bcache-dev 2015-01-21 11:04 ` Stephen R. van den Berg 2015-01-21 16:45 ` Stephen R. van den Berg @ 2015-01-21 22:47 ` Slava Pestov 2015-01-21 23:04 ` Stephen R. van den Berg 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Slava Pestov @ 2015-01-21 22:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen R. van den Berg; +Cc: Kent Overstreet, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:04 AM, Stephen R. van den Berg <srb@cuci.nl> wrote: > Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x7fffffff SErr 0x0 action 0x0 > Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: irq_stat 0x40000008 > Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED > Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: cmd 60/00:c0:10:d0:d9/04:00:01:00:00/40 tag 24 ncq 524288 in > Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: res 41/40:00:d0:d1:d9/00:00:01:00:00/00 Emask 0x409 (media error) <F> > Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: status: { DRDY ERR } > Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: error: { UNC } > Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: configured for UDMA/133 > I'm not sure this is related. Do you see it during normal operation ever? It is possible that we're spinning in softirq context or something, starving the device, but I'm not sure... > Jan 21 11:43:46 ip144 kernel: bcache: register_cache() registered cache device sda3 > Jan 21 11:43:46 ip144 kernel: bcache: register_cache() registered cache device sdb3 > Jan 21 11:43:46 ip144 kernel: bcache: register_bdev() registered backing device sdg > Jan 21 11:43:46 ip144 kernel: bcache: register_bdev() registered backing device sdc > Jan 21 11:43:46 ip144 kernel: bcache: register_bdev() registered backing device sdf > Jan 21 11:43:46 ip144 kernel: bcache: register_bdev() registered backing device sde > Jan 21 11:43:46 ip144 kernel: bcache: register_bdev() registered backing device sdd > Jan 21 11:43:46 ip144 kernel: bcache: error on 04063132-f7e1-4f29-a3aa-675491b426f4: sdb3: bad magic (got 17495323148306469098 expect 5629218783827753365) while reading prios from bucket 16868 > Jan 21 11:43:46 ip144 kernel: bcache: register_bcache() error opening /dev/sdb3: error reading priorities This is a bcache-dev bug that we just hit in our automation runs after adding some more reboot tests. We're working on it. Slava ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.18.3 + latest bcache-dev 2015-01-21 22:47 ` 3.18.3 + latest bcache-dev Slava Pestov @ 2015-01-21 23:04 ` Stephen R. van den Berg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Stephen R. van den Berg @ 2015-01-21 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Slava Pestov; +Cc: Kent Overstreet, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org Slava Pestov wrote: >On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:04 AM, Stephen R. van den Berg <srb@cuci.nl> wrote: >> Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x7fffffff SErr 0x0 action 0x0 >> Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: irq_stat 0x40000008 >> Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED >> Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: cmd 60/00:c0:10:d0:d9/04:00:01:00:00/40 tag 24 ncq 524288 in >> Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: res 41/40:00:d0:d1:d9/00:00:01:00:00/00 Emask 0x409 (media error) <F> >> Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: status: { DRDY ERR } >> Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: error: { UNC } >> Jan 21 11:21:40 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: configured for UDMA/133 >I'm not sure this is related. Do you see it during normal operation >ever? It is possible that we're spinning in softirq context or >something, starving the device, but I'm not sure... In the second run now, with increased traffic, I do not see the above happening. Maybe I cut it short, the whole message is: Jan 21 12:09:14 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x3000 SErr 0x0 action 0x0 Jan 21 12:09:14 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: irq_stat 0x40000008 Jan 21 12:09:14 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED Jan 21 12:09:14 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: cmd 60/00:68:e8:2b:da/01:00:01:00:00/40 tag 13 ncq 131072 in Jan 21 12:09:14 ip144 kernel: res 41/40:00:b0:2c:da/00:00:01:00:00/00 Emask 0x409 (media error) <F> Jan 21 12:09:14 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: status: { DRDY ERR } Jan 21 12:09:14 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: error: { UNC } Jan 21 12:09:14 ip144 kernel: ata11.00: configured for UDMA/133 Jan 21 12:09:14 ip144 kernel: sd 10:0:0:0: [sdg] Jan 21 12:09:14 ip144 kernel: Result: hostbyte=0x00 driverbyte=0x08 Jan 21 12:09:14 ip144 kernel: sd 10:0:0:0: [sdg] Jan 21 12:09:14 ip144 kernel: Sense Key : 0x3 [current] [descriptor] Jan 21 12:09:14 ip144 kernel: Descriptor sense data with sense descriptors (in hex): Jan 21 12:09:14 ip144 kernel: 72 03 11 04 00 00 00 0c 00 0a 80 00 00 00 00 00 Jan 21 12:09:14 ip144 kernel: 01 da 2c b0 Jan 21 12:09:14 ip144 kernel: sd 10:0:0:0: [sdg] Jan 21 12:09:14 ip144 kernel: ASC=0x11 ASCQ=0x4 Jan 21 12:09:14 ip144 kernel: sd 10:0:0:0: [sdg] CDB: Jan 21 12:09:14 ip144 kernel: cdb[0]=0x88: 88 00 00 00 00 00 01 da 2b e8 00 00 01 00 00 00 Jan 21 12:09:14 ip144 kernel: blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sdg, sector 31075504 Jan 21 12:09:14 ip144 kernel: ata11: EH complete And it always happens upon a read error from HDD. -- Stephen. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-22 12:56 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-01-21 1:24 3.18.3 + latest bcache-dev Stephen R. van den Berg 2015-01-21 8:00 ` Kent Overstreet 2015-01-21 11:04 ` Stephen R. van den Berg 2015-01-21 16:45 ` Stephen R. van den Berg 2015-01-22 12:33 ` patch (Re: 3.18.3 + latest bcache-dev) Stephen R. van den Berg 2015-01-22 12:56 ` Stephen R. van den Berg 2015-01-21 22:47 ` 3.18.3 + latest bcache-dev Slava Pestov 2015-01-21 23:04 ` Stephen R. van den Berg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox